Rubber Footwear Injection Machines
12 Views

Rotary Rubber Injection Machine | Shoe Soles

Review the JG116/RU-RU rotary rubber shoe injection machine with 24 or 30 stations, mold frame dimensions and 26 cm³/s plasticizing capacity for sole projects.

DIP footwear equipment

Product, Application and Configuration

Review the JG116/RU-RU rotary rubber shoe injection machine with 24 or 30 stations, mold frame dimensions and 26 cm³/s plasticizing capacity for sole projects.

Product Overview

The JG116/RU-RU rotary rubber shoe injection machine feeds rubber compound into molds to form footwear soles. It has 24 or 30 station options and a rubber plasticizing capacity of 26 cm³/s. Select the station configuration around the compound, mold and vulcanization requirements. The plasticizing rate does not establish shot volume or hourly output.

Applications

  • Rubber sole production for footwear projects.
  • Rubber-bottom footwear requiring a defined compound and mold arrangement.
  • New rubber sole capacity or equipment selection for an existing sole design.

Specify slip resistance or heat resistance as finished-product validation targets where required. Such performance depends on the actual compound, sole design and test results.

Configuration and Selection

Start with the compound specification and a sole sample or drawing. Check mold dimensions, cavity count, interfaces and venting before assessing plasticizing capacity and clamping requirements. For existing molds, verify installation compatibility before planning reuse.

Compare the 24 and 30 station options using the target vulcanization time, indexing time, operating sequence and output per mold. Station count alone cannot establish hourly production. Include loading, unloading and any manual auxiliary operations in the production review.

Use the target compound and mold for acceptance trials. Agree on continuous production duration, product weight variation, appearance and recorded output, with numerical limits in the project specification.

Discuss Your Project

Share the rubber compound specification, sole sample or drawing, target weight, mold information and output per shift. Add available floor space and any robotic operation requirements to review the station configuration, molding sequence and acceptance criteria for the project.

Product, Application and Configuration
Configuration references

Technical Specifications

The two mold frame sizes are alternatives; their relationship to station count is not established. Clamping force and screw dimensions require technical confirmation.

Technical ParameterJG116/RU-RU
Station options24 or 30
Mold frame dimensions200 × 400 mm / 200 × 430 mm; confirm the applicable configuration
Rubber plasticizing capacity26 cm³/s; a volumetric rate, not shot volume
Equipment functions

Key Features

Review these functions against the selected material, tooling and operating scope.

Rotary station options

Rotary station configurations: compare 24 and 30 stations against vulcanization, indexing and operating times.

Injection stroke measurement

Injection stroke measurement: monitor injection movement and assess metering repeatability through consecutive trial shots.

Proportional hydraulics

Proportional hydraulics: review pressure and flow adjustment ranges for the intended compound and mold.

PID temperature control

PID temperature control: define the temperature range and control accuracy in the technical configuration.

Optional robotic integration

Optional robotic integration: roughing and release-agent spraying require a stated scope for robots, tooling and programs.

Configuration questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Does 26 cm³/s mean a 26 cm³ shot?
No. The unit cm³/s describes volume per second, so the listed plasticizing capacity is a rate. It does not state the injection volume available in one shot. Confirm the required shot volume and processing cycle separately for the target sole and compound.
How should 24 and 30 stations be compared?
Use the required vulcanization time and the operating sequence as the comparison basis. Add indexing time, output per mold and available floor space. A higher station count does not by itself establish a higher finished-product output when other process times remain undefined.
Can existing molds be reused?
Check the frame dimensions, cavity count, interfaces and venting against the proposed machine configuration. Similar outer dimensions alone do not establish compatibility. Confirm the required clamping arrangement and mold movements before planning a transfer.
Can the machine guarantee slip-resistant or heat-resistant soles?
Finished-product performance requires testing of the actual sole. The equipment designation does not establish those results. Define the intended compound, tread design and applicable performance targets in the trial plan. Submit the sole sample and testing requirements so they can be included in the acceptance scope.